New York Attorney
New York Lawyer Attorney Profile Legal Tips Verdicts and Settlements News Contact Us
Areas of Practice
Auto Accidents
Personal Injury / Wrongful Death
Medical Malpractice
Employment Discrimination
Family Law and Divorce
Real Estate
Business and Commercial Litigation
Workers' Compensation
Bankruptcy
Estate Planning, Wills and Trusts
Criminal Defense and Traffic Law
Better Business Bureau
DeLorenzo Law Firm LLP BBB Business Review

News

Rupert Murdoch attacked at phone-hacking hearing

Select committee brought to halt as activist attempts to hit News Corp chief in face with paper plate covered in shaving foam

The Murdochs' appearance before MPs for a grilling about the phone-hacking scandal was brought to a dramatic halt after an activist attempted to hit Rupert Murdoch in the face with a paper plate covered in shaving foam.

Murdoch's wife Wendi Deng, who was sitting behind her husband at the culture, media and sport committee hearing, leapt up to defend her husband and appeared to hit out at the attacker as security guards and police rushed across the room to apprehend him.

The attack happened just before 5pm on Tuesday and the News Corp chairman and chief executive was back answering MPs' questions within 20 minutes, having removed his foam-spattered suit jacket.

Murdoch's assailant, who was sitting four rows back in the committee meeting room at Portcullis House near the Houses of Parliament, apparently identified himself on Twitter shortly before the attack as a standup comic and UK Uncut activist called Jonnie Marbles.

Marbles appears to have tweeted moments before he invaded the hearing. "It is a far better thing that I do now than I have ever done before #splat," he wrote on the social media network.

Moments after the committee chairman, John Whittingdale MP, suspended the meeting, a man wearing a checked shirt was seen outside the meeting room at the House of Commons in handcuffs.

Cries of "no, no," could be heard as the man ran towards Rupert Murdoch, who was sitting in front of MPs on the committee alongside his son James.

"He was sitting four rows back," said Guardian journalist Jane Martinson, who was among the reporters in the room when the attack took place. "He walked calmly to the front and smacked it in Rupert's face."

Marbles had earlier tweeted: "I'm actually in this committee and can confirm: Murdoch is Mr Burns."

He added: "Rupert Murdoch appears to be going senile." He also tweeted: "It might be quicker if Baby Murdoch simply listed all of the things that he does know.

"One gets the sense that they haven't really done the required reading ahead of their presentation. Think they may fail this module."

Marbles describes himself on his Twitter page as an "activist, comedian, father figure and all-round nonsense. Tweeting in an impersonal capacity."

But UK Uncut moved swiftly to distance itself from the invader. "The pie in Murdoch's face was NOT a UK Uncut action, everyone!" it tweeted soon after.

Martinson added: "The man lobbed a plate of shaving foam into Murdoch's face at point-blank range. There was an astonishing reaction from Wendi, who, sitting behind her husband, immediately returned fire.

"James looked stunned, several members of room gasped, but Wendi then sat on the desk calmly wiping foam from her husband's face. There was foam all over her blue-painted toes as well as two police officers who immediately grabbed him. There was shock that he got the foam in given the tight security. Another man with a long beard was also questioned."

She added: "All the press were kept in an overspill room as the committee resumed. I'm not sure how the foam man hid the paper plate. He was wearing black combat trousers and walked straight past me from the back row where the public was sitting to within inches of Murdoch.

"Wendi was on her feet lobbing the plate back at her husband's assailant before James got up. Another woman - small and dark-haired - was the one who accosted the assailant first."

Labour MP Tom Watson, one of the members of the select committee, told Murdoch: "Your wife has a very good left hook."

Louise Mensch, a Conservative MP and fellow select committee member, said Murdoch had shown "huge guts" in being willing to carry on.

Another Labour MP, Chris Bryant, described the attack as "just despicable". He said witnesses should not be treated in such a manner and described it as contempt of parliament.

Associates of Marbles said he "lives and breathes politics" and had been involved in previous UK Uncut protests.

• To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly "for publication".


Local Attorney Paul E. DeLorenzo Authors Chapter for Book About Defense Strategies

SCHENECTADY, N.Y. ­- Paul E. DeLorenzo, Managing Partner of The DeLorenzo Law Firm LLP in Schenectady, is among the contributors to a new legal publication for New York State lawyers titled, "Strategies for Defending DWI Cases in New York."

The 216-page book is published by Aspatore Books, a leading publisher of business and legal books, journals and reports.

Mr. DeLorenzo's chapter is titled, "The Fundamentals of DWI Defense in New York State." The chapter examines the legal and strategic skills that are necessary to mount a vigorous defense of a client facing a DWI charge, and the increasingly difficult task of persuading prosecutors to consider a plea in exchange for a reduced charge.

Mr. DeLorenzo writes about various defense tactics, including the selection and preparation of expert witnesses, common errors in the selection process, and ensuring that your witnesses are credible and reliable. He also writes about preparing a client for trial, including advice that the client's demeanor will be watched closely by the judge and jury, even if he or she does not testify that person is actually "testifying". " A defendant's demeanor and attitude are as big a part of a trial as anything else...he or she is actually testifying about themselves even while walking through the courthouse halls." He further states..." The jury, Judge, adversary and clerks are always watching to learn about you. Don't be fooled into thinking testimony is only about the spoken word".

"Our system of laws and its respect for the rights of the accused are among the most treasured hallmarks of our democracy," Mr. DeLorenzo said. "I'm honored to have been asked to contribute to the body of knowledge that helps maintain our judicial traditions and equips fellow defense attorneys to carry out our responsibilities in the most effective way possible."

"Strategies for Defending DWI Cases in New York" provides an authoritative, insider's perspective on best practices for counseling clients on DWI charges in New York State. It includes tips for examining police reports, deciphering scientific evidence and identifying weaknesses or problems with the case. The book is part of Aspatore Books' "Inside the Minds" series, which provides readers with proven insight and intelligence from leaders in their fields.

Protect Victims and Stand up for Patients Rights!!!

The health care industry is lobbying state legislators in Albany to pass a bill which would severely limit the rights of all victims of medical malpractice.

The proposed bill would limit or "cap" pain and suffering compensation in all medical malpractice cases to $250,000, even for the most damaging medical mistakes, including those that leave a patient blind, paralyzed, brain damaged, disfigured, infertile or otherwise gravely injured for life. Caps would shield doctors and hospitals from the full consequences of their negligence.

This bill would also take away the rights of babies who suffer brain damage at birth due to medical negligence to be fully compensated in a court of law for their injuries. Instead, these children would receive very limited coverage for their future medical costs from a newly created state bureaucratic fund -- under conditions which would ensure that they will never receive the quality of care they need and deserve. Meanwhile, negligent hospitals and doctors will not be responsible for paying any of those costs. That's wrong.

If hospitals, doctors and insurance companies want to save money it should not be on the backs of innocents victims of medical negligence. The best solution to reducing costs is to reduce medical errors and the injuries they cause.

Click here to instantly connect to our office.
Click here to read helpful information
Attorney Web Design The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Address: 670 Franklin Street, Suite 100, Schenectady, New York 12305